Colin Baxter <m43...@yandex.com> writes: > > I do not see much improvement using your variant as well. Also, > > note that, for example, Elisp manual is full of constructs like > > what we are discussing. > > The line could be removed?
Then we will lose an important information. I personally do not find the line confusing and I do see similar terminology being used in other manuals. So, unless other users also find this line confusing, I do not see any reason to change the existing wording. Best, Ihor
