Joost Kremers <joostkrem...@fastmail.fm> writes: >>> looking into the source code (parsebib.el), the library seems to be >>> under a BSD-type license. > > Yes, it is. It's a single file and the license is at the top. I can add a > separate license file if that's necessary.
It is not required. Just a bit confusing - Github is only able to detect license info when you have a dedicated license file. Hence, Github currently treats your repo as unlicensed - no license info is listed in the "Info" sidebar. >> Then, I am wondering if parsebib can be added to ELPA or at least >> non-GNU ELPA. The same can be said for all other dependencies of >> citeproc.el and for citeproc itself. > > I'd have no problem if it were added to non-GNU ELPA. GNU ELPA is a little > difficult because I don't have a copyright assignment on file. (It's proven a > little difficult to get someone in the company to sign the corporate > waiver...) non-GNU ELPA is also fine. The idea is to avoid asking users to add extra package repo configuration. It will be the best if M-x package-install just works. ELPA and non-GNU ELPA should be available by default in newer Emacs versions. Best, Ihor
