On 26/07/2022 11:26, K K wrote:
On 2022-07-26 Tue. 09:23 +0700，Max Nikulin wrote：
> However the suggestion was namely to use U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE and
> it
> is actually implemented since `org-emphasis-regexp-components'
> currently
> contains [:space:].
> ...
> K, could you, please, clarify what is your particular use case?
My bad, I misunderstood the "feature" mentioned in the old post.
My use case is to emphasize chinese characters without spaces being
inserted, even those zero-width spaces. For example "中文*测*试" should
be enough to emphasize "测".
I am using zero-width spaces right now, and it works fine in org-mode
buffers, but if exported to latex-pdf files, the U+200B ZERO WIDTH SPACE
character will not be zero-width for certain fonts. So I hope not to use
that character.
I have not tested it, but I expect you can use
- export filter that removes zero-width spaces at the last export stage.
I assume that your documents do not contain them besides markup workaround
- #+latex_header: \DeclareUnicodeCharacter{200B}{}
- custom link
#+begin_src elisp :results none :exports both
(org-link-set-parameters
"sep"
:export (lambda (path desc backend)
(if (org-export-derived-backend-p backend 'org)
(org-link-make-string (concat "sep:" path) desc)
(or desc ""))))
#+end_src
"中文[[sep:][*测*]]试"
https://list.orgmode.org/ssp8e7$ah2$1...@ciao.gmane.io/
Max Nikulin Re: [RFC] Creole-style / Support for
**emphasis**__within__**a word** Tue, 25 Jan 2022 23:27:50 +0700
In other thread we are discussing advantages and problems of switching
from PdfLaTeX to LuaLaTeX for non-latin scripts. The latter is a Unicode
engine. I am curious what is your opinion from standpoint of Chinese
language, namely amount of required customization in both cases. I
think, it is better to either start a dedicated thread, or find the part
of discussion related to fonts and babel (LaTeX package) setup.
