Daniel Fleischer <danfl...@gmail.com> writes: > At first it makes sense, but we do have headlines and TODO keywords to > express different states, colors and even sets of states. This is just a > checklist construct. I think if I wanted to mark something as canceled > or not relevant I would do something like this: > > - [ ] this is important. > - [X] +canceled+ this is not important. > > or even strike through everything.
FWIW, I use this: - [X] +This task will probably be canceled+ I don't think we should implement a new status for canceled tasks. On top of the implementation (C-u C-u C-u C-c C-c ?), I believe it is more flexible to be able to let canceled tasks block the whole set of tasks---or not. So both these tasks seem useful to me: - [X] +A canceled task+ - [-] +A canceled task+ Implementing "canceled tasks" will probably force one interpretation over another, we lose in flexibility and readability. 2 cts, -- Bastien
