Glad to hear you guys worked this out. I agree with Carsten that the image itself is/was the preferred method.I don't agree that transparent images are a problem but that's for a different topic/thread. It looks great on my end guys!
On Thu, Jun 25, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com > wrote: > > On Jun 25, 2009, at 5:02 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > > Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> On Jun 25, 2009, at 4:28 PM, Sebastian Rose wrote: >>> >>> Bastien <bastiengue...@googlemail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: >>>>> >>>>> What would be wrong with pulling the image out of the >>>>>> background and making it directly clickable? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> None, I've done this. >>>>> >>>> >>> Great. I am also more comfortable with this because invisible >>> clicking areas are notoriously used by fishing sites to make users >>> believe they click one thing, and in fact they click another. >>> >>> At least this is how I interpret what I hear. Lets try to keep >>> things transparent..... >>> >> ^^^^^^^^^^ >> you mean opaque ;) >> > > Great catch! > > - Carsten > > > >> It's the invisible clicky things that are the problem :) >> >> -Bernt >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Emacs-orgmode mailing list > Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >
_______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
