On 02/11/2022 12:04, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
See the attached new version of the patch.
The patch looks reasonable. I have not tried it in action though.
Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes:[[file:file-b.org]] "../file-b.org" is appropriate default description. I do not expect "../" here.I also noticed this, but I feel that it is reasonable. In odt, "file-b.org" implies a resource inside the odt archive. "../file-b.org" will highlight that it is an external file. I'd prefer to leave the "../file" description for now and only do something when/if we hear from the ox-odt users.
While e.g. EPUB may have multiple content files inside the container, I am unaware of similar feature for ODF. E.g. master document is linked to other "containers", not to files inside the same container. I consider links to resources inside .zip as something really special. I am afraid that "../" will cause user confusion like we had in the beginning.
