> > > > I think we are needlessly complicating this. We are talking about the > use of a term in an internal code base. While I would agree heading is > more correct, I don't think it is such a big issue to use headline if > that make the transition to a consistent usage easier. When it comes to > code, I think consistency trumps correctness. > > I agree. I think the original post was about inconsistency in the documentation. We should just correct the documentation, use the word heading consistently throughout, and mention at a prominent place that the headline symbol is used in the code to parse headings. There is nothing wrong with that.
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Rudolf Adamkovič
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Ihor Radchenko
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Tim Cross
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Bastien Guerry
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Vikas Rawal
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Timothy
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Bastien Guerry
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Bastien
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Ihor Radchenko
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Tim Cross
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Vikas Rawal
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Ihor Radchenko
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Bastien
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Ihor Radchenko
- Re: [RFC] Re: Headings and Headlines Ihor Radchenko