Jean Louis <bugs@gnu.support> writes: > Message was on topic as it provided design directions on how to avoid > properties, without technical actual program. > > Numerous people will express numerous directions on how specific > problem may be solved. > > Take the life as it is.
I agree that your message is on topic. Just, as I pointed, I feel like it is a bit too broad to be useful. I may be wrong, of course. > I don't appreciate this kind of slap and wining about nothing! It is not "nothing" for me. I'd prefer to have helpful discussion happening in Org ML. Your message might be helpful, but I feel like it might not. I understand that my message might be frustrating, but I wanted to see if others feel similar. If nobody else support my concern, I will correct myself and accept that my definition of "too broad" diverges from most other Org ML subscribers. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
