Agree. How do you run such feature polls?
Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> schrieb am Di., 27. Dez. 2022, 17:20:
> Michael Dauer <mick.da...@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > I'm aware of this theoretical conflict. But I see the risk as very low
> > compared to the value of not having to make a lot of customizations for
> > export and internal link handling. It should just work out of the box.
>
> Even low risk does not justify impossible-to-use links when such problem
> occurs.
>
> > If you deem necessary there would still be the possibility to define a
> > global switch for this. This could then still have the 100% save default,
> > while still being easy to "configure".
>
> > If you want to go so far you could mitigate the risk of a conflict by
> > "escaping" the macro brackets. {{{{{{not-a-macro}}}}}} would be treated
> as
> > {{{not-a-marco}}} without expansion. Or any other escape sequence to
> bring
> > the conflict probability to 0.0000001.
>
> This is all indeed possible. The main question if whether it is
> justified to introduce all these complexities given the provided
> alternatives.
>
> Basically, we need more votes in favour to consider such feature.
>
> --
> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> Org mode contributor,
> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
>
