Bastien Guerry <b...@gnu.org> writes: >> are there reasons not to punt the orphanage issue to this emacs >> orphanage (and, point to it from the org wiki)? on the one hand, "less >> control". on the other, "less work" (even "globally", if things scale). > > Indeed, perhaps https://github.com/emacsorphanage is a good shelter > for Org orphan packages already.
It is a good shelter, but I was hoping to promote Sourcehut and discourage people using Github to report issues in favour of Org mailing list. Otherwise, I have no objections to Jonas Bernoulli doing the background maintenance. Less work for us at the end. One thing we may do though is letting him know about https://orgmode.org/worg/org-orphanage.html - he may contact us or use GitHub mentions, and he may let us know when a new Org-related package lands on his repo. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
