to be clear, i won't object to that syntax, as i think it is as intuitive as anything else in tses already, but do have the concerns i raised in general.
On 1/15/23, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 1/15/23, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: >> My proposal is as little new syntax as I was able to come up with. > > i kind of like it actually. :] > > but i just wanted to bring up the issue of 1] the possibility of > drawing a line in the sand at some point wrt creeping syntax [even if > not in tses for repeaters], [in principle in tses if tz complexity > turns out to demand more user specification etc.], and 2] 3rd party > and personal code that ... who knows what parsing lurks. unintended > consequences and all that. > > i checked my very old own code and indeed i'm not trying to get the > repeater with strict re character group, but in principle i can > imagine code by others could have. > >> >> -- >> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, >> Org mode contributor, >> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. >> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, >> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> >> > > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic > > A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: > https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
