Dear All, first of all, sorry for replying that late.
On Tue, 20 Dec 2022 at 11:46, Christian Moe <m...@christianmoe.com> wrote: > Arbitrary sexps would give us more flexibility. Alternately, one could > achieve more or less the same by letting :filter collect any additional > arguments and pass them as &rest to the user's predicate function, > something like: > > #+PRINT_BIBLIOGRAPHY: :filter bibitem-lang-p nb nn no :type article I like this proposal a lot -- it seems to strike a good balance with regard to safety and flexibility. I'll try to make the required changes on the citeproc-el side and then propose a patch here. > Alternatively, I think there is a case for adding a user-friendly > :language property to the print_bibliography keyword. On my bookshelf it > vies with primary/secondary sources as the most common criterion for > separate bibliographies. > I was going to say that this is the only extension I can think of that > is needed beside :(not)(csl)type and :(not)keyword, but of course people > are sooner or later going to want easy-to-use properties to filter by > author, publication date ranges, and probably other criteria I cannot > think of right now, so it's a strategic decision for the maintainer(s) > if you want to go that way. :-) this is also a useful suggestion, although with the added difficulty of having to support both bib(la)tex and csl-json, which use, I think, different sets of language codes. best wishes, András > Yours, > Christian
