[feel free to ignore those suggestions as surely there are better alterntives, and urgency is still good.]
On 3/23/23, Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> wrote: > thank you for that. surely now fewer users will be confused. > > i find that when 2 things are being conflated, whether in software or > in anything else, it is useful to change the name of both of them for > maximum clarity, future git searches, etc. > > thus, perhaps i would suggest somthign like this slight tweak instead. > > priority-cookie-up > priority-cookie-and-planning-urgency-up > > if not too verbose. reasoning: urgency is occasionally considered > orthogonal to priority in some philosophies, and some users have > :urgent: tags. so this might eliminate slightly more confusion in > principle. > > > On 3/23/23, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: >> Samuel Wales <samolog...@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> perhaps we could have 2 names: one for the priority cookie setting and >>> one for whatever the agenda does. >> >> This is a good idea. Thanks! >> >> See the attached fix making use of Samuel's suggestion. >> >> > > > -- > The Kafka Pandemic > > A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: > https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com > -- The Kafka Pandemic A blog about science, health, human rights, and misopathy: https://thekafkapandemic.blogspot.com
