Hello, I'm a bit overworked at the moment, sorry for the delay in response.
> We may have to use the approach employed for :results header argument > where in addition to (:results . "string value"), we have > (:result-params "sub-value" "sub-value" ...). Isn't this similar to my `:tangle-sync' parameter, i.e, completely separate from the `:tangle' header itself but complementary to it? Why can't we just go back to that? Best
