> From: Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> > Cc: i...@whxvd.name, 65...@debbugs.gnu.org, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org > Date: Thu, 07 Sep 2023 10:00:49 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii <e...@gnu.org> writes: > > > Then perhaps just a special value for buffer-invisibility-spec, or > > some other simple variation of a property Org already uses? > > We may have a misunderstanding here. > In "* Heading text :tag1:tag2:", everything is visible yet Org needs to > protect ":tag1:tag2: from being killed by `kill-line', but not from > `kill-whole-line'. Moreover, the behaviour also depends on the point > position - if point is inside ":tag1:tag2:", we fall back to the default > behaviour. And the whole "special" behaviour can also be switched off by > flipping `org-special-ctrl-k'. > > Invisibility has nothing to do with this need.
Isn't it true that invisibility is what causes the user expectations in this case to begin with? Then saying that "invisibility has nothing to do with this" is not really accurate, is it? > >> What about something like `end-of-visible-line-function'? > > > > That is also a possibility, but it will then affect kill-line > > _anywhere_ in the buffer, whereas a text property can have a more > > localized effect. Are you sure kill-line will need this customization > > on the whole buffer? > > Applying text property is not free - (1) we need to do it across the > whole buffer, which scales poorly; (2) we need to keep it updated as the > buffer changes, which scales even worse. In addition, adding more text > properties slow down redisplay, which Org already strains to its limits. I understand, but in my book correctness tramps performance, and I was trying to make the point that perhaps modifying the behavior of kill-line everywhere in Org buffers might be incorrect for some cases.