Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> writes: > I think that we may need to introduce a customization for default link > description. Some backends hard-code the default description to > something non-trivial and some just use arbitrary fallback like ??? > (ox-ascii), "No description" (ox-html), or "" (ox-latex).
I wonder, why not export [[link]] to <<link>> as "link" by default, if no description is given, as is the case with URLs, Elisp, and the like? And if that is not desirable, would the new customization allow for doing that? I am asking the second question because I am still hoping to solve my problem with the impracticality of [[Literal link][literal link]]s in densely linked text, as explained in my other thread. If Org could export [[link]] to <<link>> as "link", and offered a STARTUP for literal links, then that would fix my problem for good. Thank you! Rudy -- "Simplicity is complexity resolved." -- Constantin Brâncuși, 1876-1957 Rudolf Adamkovič <salu...@me.com> [he/him] Studenohorská 25 84103 Bratislava Slovakia
