Ihor Radchenko writes: > I see now. I guess I did not really have a full understanding of the > purpose of emacs-sync. So, it might be helpful to add a similar > explanation to worg/org-maintenance.org.
Okay, I'll plan to do that. >> I don't see what problem it solves. It's moving the divergence to a >> different file (that would still be tracked in emacs-sync), and it adds >> one more Org-specific wrinkle to the Emacs tree. (Also, the orgcard >> source would still be different given the upstream hunk in the diff I >> posted in my last message.) > > My idea was not to sync that another extra file at all and leave it in > Emacs repo only. I see. Not that it matters given what you say below, but I would probably lean toward keeping track of such a file in emacs-sync. > But the same will not work for xml and other diverging > files. I now don't see any reason to change the existing state of affairs. All right, thanks for your input. I'll try to improve worg/org-maintenance.org as discussed.
