Until about a month ago, I was a non-emacs user; and indeed, I thought it's bad looking and, in some respects, primitive. The reason I started using it anyway is org-mode: I wanted a decent outliner, and none of the others I tried fit my way of working. So I gave it a try despite the way it looks.
Now I use emacs+org-mode for outlining, planning, taking notes, drafting papers, and almost anything else that has to do with text. As far as I'm concerned, org-mode is no longer just 'likely to change' the way I do everything. Gabi User <spamfilteracco...@gmail.com> wrote: > No wonder it didn't win. Non-emacs users have few incentive to > try it, since they think emacs is bad looking and primitve in > general, so they are looking for something more flashy instead > and do not even try it. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode