> Would you also be able to create a reproducer, so that we can replicate
the problem and write a test?
Yeah, I just have to make some indentation text invisible. Where
should such a test live? Where is your documentation on running a
test?
> It looks like you did not send the patch with git send-emai.
Nope. Magit patch create. Attaching another patch.
> This math is not accurate when tabs are present.
You want to short circuit this kind of conversation. I was not
actually aware of any tabs versus spaces aware functions to build on
top of since I always use spaces. Had I not already found another way
to correct the behavior, this would have been a dead-end I would have
had to round trip.
I'm presuming tests don't get their own changelog entries. Is that correct?
From 965b60f58512b009778b7b5279394bf01d407c3f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Psionik K <73710933+psioni...@users.noreply.github.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 22:37:28 +0900
Subject: [PATCH] org-macs.el: org-do-remove-indentation correction
* lisp/org-macs.el (org-do-remove-indentation): set
`buffer-invisibility-spec' to nil before detecting the column or
moving to a column.
This fixes src_block indentation removal for org-modern-mode but will
also correct other cases of hidden indentation.
---
lisp/org-macs.el | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lisp/org-macs.el b/lisp/org-macs.el
index 8def5cbb..7f5d2ad8 100644
--- a/lisp/org-macs.el
+++ b/lisp/org-macs.el
@@ -408,7 +408,8 @@ line. Return nil if it fails."
;; Remove exactly N indentation, but give up if not possible.
(when skip-fl (forward-line))
(while (not (eobp))
- (let ((ind (progn (skip-chars-forward " \t") (current-column))))
+ (let* ((buffer-invisibility-spec nil)
+ (ind (progn (skip-chars-forward " \t") (current-column))))
(cond ((< ind n)
(if (eolp) (delete-region (line-beginning-position) (point))
(throw :exit nil)))
--
2.42.0
