> From: Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> > Cc: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], > [email protected], [email protected] > Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2024 12:39:18 +0000 > > Eli Zaretskii <[email protected]> writes: > > >> I think that I see what you mean. What we can do to achieve this is > >> changing `kill-line-query-function' into abnormal hook > >> `kill-line-query-functions'. Then, `kill-line'/`kill-whole-line' will > >> use (run-hook-with-args-until-success 'kill-line-query-functions) to > >> decide whether to show a query. > >> > >> Does it make sense? > > > > It might, yes. But do we have to _replace_ the hook? cannot we have > > both? I.e. if the new one is defined, call it, otherwise call the old > > one. That would be more backward-compatible, I think. > > May you please elaborate what you mean by "old one"?
kill-line-query-function
