Ihor Radchenko writes: >> Can anyone think of a possible scenario where removing the '\\[0pt]' in >> the last line would cause a problem? If not, I might send a patch in the >> next few days. (I'm afraid that going back to abusing >> replace-regexp-in-string. I can't think of any other more elegant >> solution...). > > In such scenario, we may technically violate what users ask us to do: > > #+begin_verse > I really want newline here\\ > #+end_verse
I'm not sure if users asked for that specifically. You want a new line when there is a new line. This makes sense: #+begin_verse I really want newline here\\ blah... #+end_verse This does not: #+begin_verse I really want newline here\\ #+end_verse For LaTeX it is the same as this: #+begin_verse I really want newline here #+end_verse But this specifically alters the expected result in LaTeX, modifying the space after the environment: #+begin_verse I really want newline here\\[0pt] #+end_verse What is the cause? I don't know. But it happens. Best regards, Juan Manuel