In response to Tommy Kelly <tommy.ke...@verilab.com> writing: >> ...if there is already one or more datetrees anywhere in [a] file AT A LEVEL >> BELOW THAT specified by [a datetree-based capture] template [then] the >> position specified by the template is simply ignored.
Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote: > Are you sure that what you describe is newly introduced? > I'd expect this exact behavior since forever, judging from how > `org-datetree--find-create' is implemented. No, I'm not sure. In fact, now you mention it, what you're suggesting probably is the case. This is the first time I've tried using more than one datetree in the same file, so I wouldn't before have noticed the behavior I describe. That said, had I noticed it in the past, I would have been inclined to flag it as an issue. At very least it makes the documentation incorrect, but in fact I'd say that the documentation is fine and the behavior is wrong. Nevertheless, it's not connected with the issue you already fixed (https://list.orgmode.org/878r3xfm90.fsf@localhost/T/#t) so that should remain closed. thx.
