Juan Manuel Macías <maciasch...@posteo.net> writes:
> As I already said, in my local branch I have both elements created,
> based on the same syntax:
>
> - language block: :lang{text}
>
> - special block &type{text}
Why not &:lang{text} (and/or &:lang[options]{text}) instead? In fact,
it might help (in that it may reduce the need for escaping within the
"text") if the syntax was &:type{text} with "lang" being one of the
possible type (as opposed to the type being ":lang").
--
Suhail
