Tim Ruffing <cry...@timruffing.de> writes: > Hm, now that I think about it again, I'm not sure that defining a new > function is worth the hassle. There's nothing wrong with the current > function or the optional argument, in the sense that callers can simply > choose not to use the optional argument. > > If anything, I think it would rather add a comment that it's > obsolete/there for historical reasons and should not be used. Let me > know if you think that's desirable.
Yes, we can add such a comment to the docstring. However, your total contributions are now at the limit we can legally accept without FSF copyright assignment. Would you consider doing copyright paperwork as described in <https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contribute.html#copyright>? > Subject: [PATCH] org-agenda: Make sure skipping warning/delay days never > increases their number Applied, onto main, with minor amendments to the commit message. https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git/commit/?id=356072c1d Thanks! -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>