Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> writes: > On 19/04/2024 00:58, Корякин Артём wrote: >>> shell-file-name >> ; "pwsh.exe" >>> system-type >> ; windows-nt >>> (w32-shell-dos-semantics) >> ; nil > > I have no idea what style of escaping is expected by pwsh.exe. If it > is the same as for cmd.exe then I would try to add it to > `w32-system-shells' and would file a bug report against emacs with > links to docs. However pwsh.exe as a shell may require dedicated > support in Emacs (it it does not lead to other issues). > > See emacs sources for details.
Thanks. I removed that part of the config that sets pwsh.exe as shell-file-name and now latex-previews works without any problems and necessity to run workaround. I am sorry. It was my fault all way around. >> and removed shell-quote-argument from org-fc functions[4]. > > It is no go. Improper escaping leads to vulnerabilities like I get it. I understand that something like that only can be a temporary local solution. > you dropped my address in the second copy I would not receive a duplicate. >> I don't know how to do this automatically from gnus unfortunately. > I am not a Gnus user. Perhaps it has reply to list and reply to all > actions. Unfortunately the message composed in gmail lacks In-Reply-To > and Reference headers, and it causes broken thread. I am sorry again. Gnus has post follow up on article button and gnus-summary-wide-reply[-with-original] commands. I tried the former Best regards, Artsiom.
