PT <spamfilteracco...@gmail.com> writes: Hi!
>> So it would spare at least an M-left for the user which doesn't seem >> much, but small things add up in the long run. >> > > Maybe the M-right part wouldn't be too hard either. If above the moved > up header (which is now at the same level as its previous parent > header after an automatic M-left) there is an other header on the same > level then it could be put under it with an automatic M-right. > > It could spare 2 keypresses which would be a real improvement. I can't see that this would be a big improvement. If you want to move the subtree that far away that the number of keystrokes invoced makes a difference, then probably you should have used refiling in the first run. At least I'm one of those that would accidentially destroy the document structure with such an automatic reparenting. ;-) Well, as optional feature I don't have an opinion. But I think you could add an around advice to `org-metaup' to get that behavior. Simply ad-do-it and catch a possible error. If there was none, you are ok. If there was one, you have to call `org-metaleft' followed by `org-metaup' again. Bye, Tassilo _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
