-------- Original Message -------- On 6/19/25 1:01 PM, Ihor Radchenko <yanta...@posteo.net> wrote:
> Michael Mauger <mmau...@protonmail.com> writes: > > > I'd suggest remembering the buffer itself rather than the buffer name. > Also, like `sql-product-interactive', you can control a portion of the buffer > name in the `sql-connect' call. But again, it would be safer to use the > buffer itself to memoize the session. Your org session name would translate > to the buffer rather than the potentially changed buffer name. > > Org mode markup communicates "session" by naming it. > So, one way or another, Org mode APIs expect some way to link session > name string to actual buffer. > > API-wise, it is done via `org-babel-session-buffer', which can > optionally use special function org-babel-session-buffer:sql (if > defined) to perform backend-specific logic. > My suggestion was to store the stable buffer object with the session. The API can serve up the name of that's what is what is expected but recognize that while the buffer is stable, the buffer name might not be depending upon the users configuration. I also want to make sure that you are not relying upon some naming convention of SQLi buffer names to your session names. In the end, these are org decisions but I cannot guarantee stability of the buffer naming convention generated by sql-mode going forward…
