> On Jun 24, 2025, at 4:00 AM, Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Charles, do you plan further changes of org-protocol.org? Are you interested > in discussion of its modifications?
- Although I claim no monopoly ownership of org-protocol.org, there are still parts of it that I think still need updating and would like to provide input to. - The section (Windows/Setup the Org protocol scheme handler) needs to be updated. - My thoughts would be to work with a user with Emacs 30.1 on Windows 11 and write down their findings. - The section (Common/Setup Org protocol open source) seems to be an early version of "(org) The open-source protocol”. - I think this section should be rewritten to just link to the Org manual. I can make a patch for this. - The page org-protocol-custom-handler.org needs to be updated or rewritten. - This is a feature that I have not tried yet. If there is another who is more experienced on this matter, I’d be happy for them to take this on. - A historical account of Org protocol is needed. - As I was not an Org user at the time of Org protocol’s inception, I do not consider myself qualified to account on it. Open ask for someone who can. > I had in mind even more aggressive deduplication, see the attachment. I’ll make a patch to consolidate the section (Test your Org protocol setup). That said, my reluctance to do so to this point was to avoid forcing the user to jump any more in document than they already have to. However, I think in terms of document maintenance, the consolidation will be a win. > > I do not think, the "3rd Party Applications" group is required. If it is > dropped then Captee becomes a sibling of browser bookmarklets. > <org-protocol.diff> I’ll make a separate patch to do this. All my best - Charles — Charles Y. Choi, Ph.D. kickingve...@gmail.com
