Hi,
I have noticed another case when "latex" in "#+begin_latex" is rendered
as subscript in a Worg article. Do you expect massive regressions if
subscript without explicit curly braces are suppressed? See the attached
patch. Certainly it should be typed as =#+begin_latex=, cases when
authors forget verbatim or code markers are not rare.From 04655e4acce7a76a779f99b566aa258fa0b78c6d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Max Nikulin <maniku...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 21:33:17 +0700
Subject: [PATCH] publish.sh: Suppress subscripts without braces
Mitigate subscript heuristics false positive when
"#+begin_latex" and similar markup constructs are mentioned
without verbatim markers.
---
publish.sh | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/publish.sh b/publish.sh
index 27ffa11c..716f1480 100755
--- a/publish.sh
+++ b/publish.sh
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@ This variable can be set when running publish.sh script:
(setq org-confirm-babel-evaluate nil
ess-ask-for-ess-directory nil
ess-startup-directory nil
+ org-export-with-sub-superscripts '{}
org-html-style-default ""
org-html-scripts ""
org-html-htmlize-output-type 'css
--
2.39.5
