Hi Pedro.

> I've come up with a solution, which is to customise the mode the
export buffer is opened with. You could set it to plain latex-mode
instead of LaTeX-mode. This will disable auctex functionality. Would
that be an issue for you?

I don't see that being a problem.

> If you are interested, I could share a patch for the all-tex-fonts
feature branch.

I can try, but I'm not sure I will be able to test it as I don't have a
testing emacs installation. So if it requires many changes, then I won't be
able to do it.

> Speaking of which... I have been trying to reproduce the problem on a
clean emacs (master) with auctex/reftex from elpa and the feature
branch and was not able.
Could you share a bare minimum init.el file I could use to reproduce?

Isn't the code in my initial email (see below) what you need? You need to
amend the load-path entry to the location of auctex.

(use-package reftex-auc)
(use-package tex
  :load-path "site-lisp/auctex-14.0.9"
  :custom
  (TeX-parse-self t))

On Fri, 18 Jul 2025 at 07:16, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
paag...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Vangelis,
>
> I've come up with a solution, which is to customise the mode the
> export buffer is opened with. You could set it to plain latex-mode
> instead of LaTeX-mode. This will disable auctex functionality. Would
> that be an issue for you? I don't see any specific advantage in having
> the auctex functionality enabled on a *read-only* buffer, but that's
> also, just maybe, because I have never used it...
> If you are interested, I could share a patch for the all-tex-fonts
> feature branch.
>
> Speaking of which... I have been trying to reproduce the problem on a
> clean emacs (master) with auctex/reftex from elpa and the feature
> branch and was not able.
> Could you share a bare minimum init.el file I could use to reproduce?
>
> Best, /PA
>
> On Thu, 17 Jul 2025 at 12:04, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> <paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m quite busy with the export as such.
> >
> >  It’s an interesting challenge and I currently would like to document it
> along a variation of your workaround and then maybe discuss whether we want
> LaTeX-mode or plain latex-mode regardless Of AucTeX in the list.
> >
> > There may be some benefit of using LaTeX mode in the only export buffer,
> but I don’t see it…
> >
> > Best PA
> >
> > Enviado desde mi iPhone
> >
> > El 17 jul 2025, a las 9:16, Vangelis Evangelou <evange...@gmail.com>
> escribió:
> >
> > 
> > Hi Perdo.
> >
> > Did you manage to get a solution to this?
> >
> > Best,
> > Vangelis
> >
> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 18:05, Vangelis Evangelou <evange...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Pedro.
> >>
> >> You haven't loaded reftex though. What if you add (use-package reftex)
> in your configuration?
> >>
> >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 16:36, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
> paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Just to close this. I'm not able to completely reproduce the
> >>> environment. Attach is a test report.
> >>> /PA
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 16:34, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez
> >>> <paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >
> >>> > OK, forget it, I'll try myself to see if I can reproduce...
> >>> >
> >>> > Thanks for your help and patience, /PA
> >>> >
> >>> > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 11:09, Vangelis Evangelou <evange...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Hi Pedro.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > I tried what you said, but for some reason the local variables
> text doesn't get printed. Could it be because the error occurs before the
> export filter?
> >>> > >
> >>> > > In any case, I don't think this is a path towards a solution
> because local variables are set when the file is visited (opened). Here,
> the text is inserted in the buffer, so the local variables won't be set. I
> tried a "manual" approach where in the org latex export buffer I did M-:
> (setq TeX-master t) and then did M-: (reftex-TeX-master-file), but I still
> got the same error.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > TeX-master is a variable defined in ‘tex.el’.
> >>> > >
> >>> > > Its value is t
> >>> > > Local in buffer *Org LATEX Export*; global value is the same.
> >>> > >
> >>> > >
> >>> > > On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 09:42, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
> paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Hmmm...
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> This is a very trick case indeed. Apart from discerning if we
> want to
> >>> > >> blame it or not, what I would also like to take profit is from
> this
> >>> > >> for the future.
> >>> > >> If we encounter other cases and appending local variables to the
> >>> > >> export buffer solves out headache, we catch several flies with one
> >>> > >> stroke.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> What about trying:
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> #+BEGIN_SRC emacs-lisp :exports none :results none :eval export
> >>> > >> (defun add-lvars-filter (output backend info)
> >>> > >>   "Ser TeX-master-file. in the lvars"
> >>> > >>   (when (eq backend 'latex)
> >>> > >>     (replace-string "\\end{document}"
> >>> > >>      (concat "\\end{document}\n"
> >>> > >>       "\n"
> >>> > >>       "%%% Local Variables:\n"
> >>> > >>       "%%% TeX-master-file: t\n"
> >>> > >>     "%%% End:\n" ) output)))
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> (make-variable-buffer-local
> 'org-export-filter-final-output-functions)
> >>> > >> (add-to-list 'org-export-filter-final-output-functions
> >>> > >>            'add-lvars-filter)
> >>> > >> #+END_SRC
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Put that in your test document and evaluate it before C-c C-e l L.
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Thanks a ton... /PA
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> On Tue, 1 Jul 2025 at 10:27, Vangelis Evangelou <
> evange...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Hi Ichor.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > I did you what you said. There are two scenarios
> >>> > >> > Scenario 1:
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Load auctex and set TeX-parse-self to t
> >>> > >> > Create a scratch buffer and type in "\documentclass{article}"
> >>> > >> > Load LaTeX-mode with M-x LaTeX-mode
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Scenario 2:
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > Load auctex and set TeX-parse-self to t
> >>> > >> > Create a scratch buffer and type in "\documentclass{amsart}".
> Note that this is different from Scenario 1. The difference is that amsart
> uses the amstex package. Org export to latex also uses the amstex package.
> >>> > >> > Load LaTeX-mode with M-x LaTeX-mode
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > With Scenario 1 I don't get an error but with Scenario 2 I do.
> reftex-TeX-master-file: Wrong type argument: stringp, nil
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > As I said in a previous email, this may also be a bug with
> reftex. Looking at the code of reftex-TeX-master-file, I can see that
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > (let ((master
> >>> > >> >         (cond
> >>> > >> >          ;; AUCTeX is loaded.  Use its mechanism.
> >>> > >> >          ((fboundp 'TeX-master-file)
> >>> > >> >           (condition-case nil
> >>> > >> >               (TeX-master-file t)
> >>> > >> >             (error (buffer-file-name)))))))
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > and then later it says
> >>> > >> >     (cond
> >>> > >> >      ((null master)
> >>> > >> >       (error "Need a filename for this buffer, please save it
> first"))
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > However, TeX-master-file returns "<none>" if the file is not
> saved instead of nil, so it seems that reftex-TeX-master-file uses
> TeX-master-file wrongly. However, even if reftex-TeX-master-file did use
> TeX-master-file correctly, org-mode would still have a problem because it
> would hit the (error "Need a filename for this buffer, please save it
> first"). Because of this I believe that both reftex and org have a bug.
> >>> > >> >
> >>> > >> > On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 at 18:40, Ihor Radchenko <
> yanta...@posteo.net> wrote:
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> Vangelis E <evange...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> > Does this mean that you will implement my suggestion in my
> previous email?
> >>> > >> >> >
> >>> > >> >> >> On 30 Jun 2025, at 17:42, Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <
> paag...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> > >> >> >>
> >>> > >> >> >> Thanks for trying! I'm just trying to find a flexible
> solution for
> >>> > >> >> >> future requirements like this...
> >>> > >> >> >> /PA
> >>> > >> >> >> ...
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> Before this discussion stray too far away, and before I look
> into the
> >>> > >> >> report seriously, I have a suspicion that you are simply
> running into
> >>> > >> >> Auctex bug. Try creating a new buffer, not associated with any
> file,
> >>> > >> >> add some basic text code inside, and activate auctex there.
> Will it err?
> >>> > >> >> If yes, that's a bug in auctex.
> >>> > >> >>
> >>> > >> >> --
> >>> > >> >> Ihor Radchenko // yantar92,
> >>> > >> >> Org mode maintainer,
> >>> > >> >> Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>.
> >>> > >> >> Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>,
> >>> > >> >> or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> --
> >>> > >> Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
> >>> > >> Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> >>> > >> Georg Kreisler
> >>> > >>
> >>> > >> Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE!
> >>> > >> Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
> >>> > Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> >>> > Georg Kreisler
> >>> >
> >>> > Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE!
> >>> > Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
> >>> Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> >>> Georg Kreisler
> >>>
> >>> Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE!
> >>> Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
>
>
>
> --
> Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden,
> Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden
> Georg Kreisler
>
> Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE!
> Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
>

Reply via email to