+1 /PA On Mon, 6 Oct 2025 at 10:04, Christian Moe <[email protected]> wrote: > > glab <[email protected]> writes: > > > That is a fair question. I used an empty source code block for a > > number of reasons: > > > > 1. I believed the content of the code block was irrelevant and that > > including code would cause a distraction. In the actual document I use > > Ditaa and Plant UML (so nice to have it all in the same document! > > Thank you Org-Babel people!). I changed it to a elisp block because I > > believed everyone has that installed. > > > > 2. I was really aiming for the most minimal example. > > > > 3. It would be apparent to all readers that no security foul-play was > > involved on my part. > > It's probably better to take what you're actually doing and pare it down > to a minimal (but still working) example, one that those with the > language installed can test right away and that others will not be > confused by. In this case, perhaps just the minimal Ditaa you need to > produce some graphic, like > > +-----+ > | doc | > +-----+ > > Also, settings and headers vary between Babel languages, so to resolve > your problem we might actually need to know which one you are using. > > As for security, providing a minimal example for an issue is the kind of > thing the list is for, so foul play would not be the baseline > assumption, and you can leave it up to folks here to handle your minimal > example with the appropriate caution. That said, I'd be rather more > cautious of a (non-empty) elisp block than of a ditaa one. :) > > Regards, > Christian > > > > > >
-- Fragen sind nicht da, um beantwortet zu werden, Fragen sind da um gestellt zu werden Georg Kreisler Sagen's Paradeiser, write BE! Year 1 of the New Koprocracy
