"Thomas S. Dye" <[email protected]> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: >> So, I second Max's suggestion to start from submitting your package >> to >> GNU ELPA. Once done, we can add a link to your package to WORG. >> >> Let me know if you need any guidance. > > AFAIK, Worg currently lacks links to ELPA ob-*.el packages. > Should we augment > https://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/babel/languages/index.html with a > place to add such links?
It does lack such links. The page does clearly describe how to look for packages, though. Looking at GNU ELPA, it seems they only list two ob-*.el packages, ob-haxe.el and ob-asymptote.el. Both are documented in Worg, but the Babel languages index page does not link to the Haxe documentation, whereas ob-asymptote.el is wrongly listed as a part of org-contrib. To my mind, this suggests that we /should/ add a section listing the two GNU ELPA packages and link properly to the documentation from there, and we can add any further additions (especially if they write up a docs page for Worg). Meanwhile, there are some 80 ob-*.el packages on Melpa, from the fairly obscure to Rust and PHP. Should we list them as well? It wouldn't be a problem, but it would need to be updated every now and then, and it wouldn't add value to what people can already do with list-packages if they've added Melpa. Perhaps we should list only those that put up a docs page on Worg (none at present?). WDYT? Regards, Christian
