1. solved: sent that other answer to the list too
2. now it does not trigger that error either
3. org 9.7.37

On Wed, 19 Nov 2025, at 12:55, Christian Moe wrote:
> "Racoon Chimp" <[email protected]> writes:
>
>> oh, thank you. that's it.
>>
>> first there was headline and NOT heading. 
>>
>> second, as in your case, it had zero effect. so i thought, maybe it
>> gets evaluated the other way around. changed it to:
>>
>> =(setq org-M-RET-may-split-line '((headline . nil)(default . t)))=
>>
>> and the magic does happen.
>>
>> problem solved!
>>
>> i still don't get it, but it does work as intended.
>
> Good! But very different from what I'm seeing. For me
> - your original expression triggered no error
> - the corrected expression works, regardless of order
> Not really planning to look into it, but I wonder what Org version
> you're using. I'm on 9.8-pre (release_9.7.30-367-ge8413b).
>
> Also, would you mind replying on-list (with reply-all) just so the
> thread will reflect that the matter is closed?
>
> Yours,
> Christian

Reply via email to