I have a fix for this but I want to double check if we should update the doc. The current doc for `org-heading-components' states that the priority element is:
the priority character, like ?A, or nil if no priority is given I'm assuming we want to return a priority value, as we've updated that meaning in the docs. Should I change the sentence to state: the priority value, like ?A or 42, or nil if no priority is given A patch is attached with the updated doc, but I can remove that or alter the wording based on feedback. Thanks, Derek On Sun, Jan 4, 2026 at 11:36 AM Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > > > Looks like we are done with all problems with priority cookies. > > Well. Not really. > * test tree > ** [#10] ten > ** [#2] two > > (nth 3 (org-heading-components)) > > is still incorrect. > > -- > Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, > Org mode maintainer, > Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. > Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, > or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92> > -- +---------------------------------------------------------------+ | Derek Chen-Becker | | GPG Key available at https://keybase.io/dchenbecker and | | https://pgp.mit.edu/pks/lookup?search=derek%40chen-becker.org | | Fngrprnt: EB8A 6480 F0A3 C8EB C1E7 7F42 AFC5 AFEE 96E4 6ACC | +---------------------------------------------------------------+
0001-lisp-org.el-Handle-numeric-priorities-in-org-heading.patch
Description: Binary data
