Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > 1. First-time contributors should be discouraged to use LLM > 2. The only exception to (1) is when they declare that > a. They are experienced LLM users > b. They confirm that they have reviewed the LLM-generated code and > *also the code it changes* > 3. Contributors who wrote their own patches in the past may use LLM for > smallish patches. No new substantial features. > 4. Regular contributors may be trusted to use LLM assist for new > features. They are probably experienced enough to review the > generated code and make sure that it is reasonable.
Org could also set a policy of requiring that patch submitters commit to "maintain" the change they submit for a definite period of time. "Maintain" in the sense that if git blame traces a problem back to the commit(s) they submitted, Org maintainers are entitled to ping them on the mailing list and ask them to fix it. Contributing is a learning process, and "owning" your contributions is another: in my experience, both as a maintainer and as a contributor, both processes are important. -- Bastien
