Earl Chase <[email protected]> writes: > If you take a look at, `org-babel-expand-noweb-references', you will see that > it uses `org-in-commented-heading' to check if > a heading is commented before it expands noweb references. So this isn’t a > bug. I do think it should be better documented.
Ah yes, I see. After thinking about it, using COMMENT is a more powerful tool that impacts noweb expansion and source block evaluation while exporting and tangling. > Not sure if that works in this case as I don't know why COMMENT was > chosen over "noexport". I think I started using COMMENT because M-; was so easy to remember and often I don't want sections tangled out yet into a source file along with the literate code. From a programmer point of view, COMMENT was my natural response to accomplish my immediate goal of preventing tangling and export. > Yes, the noexport tag is what you need if you want to prevent headers > from exporting in a situation where you need noweb > references to expand. This should work for me. I can control tangling as needed and perhaps i'll finally learn more about tags. Thanks again! Grant
