Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > Pedro Andres Aranda Gutierrez <[email protected]> writes: > >> I've reread the conversation and there are too many unrelated things >> popping up there. So I'd like a fresh start > > Ok. > Superseded-by: > https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/CAO48Bk_uQoPMb=kqza82u6bm5u--6vdstarjvn3rb+8mzpk...@mail.gmail.com/ > Superseded-by: > https://list.orgmode.org/orgmode/cao48bk9c1x+jcdzhhxjgdtavtzvp0ltn6i540-fmf1jghka...@mail.gmail.com/
If there are multiple identical commands, only the last one will be evaluated by BONE. So the first "Superseded-by" was ignored because of the second one, and the second one didn't point to an existing report, because [DISCUSSION] isn't a recognized label. To keep things simple, I suggest a report can be superseded by only another one (to keeps un-superseding simple too); and because the other report is a request, it seems okay to say that the original patch is related to it. > Bastien, this one is a funny edge case: > - 2 superseded > - one is not a formal request Thanks for the heads up! -- Bastien
