"Pedro A. Aranda" <[email protected]> writes: >> I will look into the patches here, but, as a reminder, the only >> remaining blocker for the feature branch was our discussion about the >> variable format for *-font-config customization. AFAIK, you included the >> question about it into your surveys. I am looking forward to seeing the >> results. > > There are no conclusive answers in other topics and this is why I'd like > to have all things fontspec sorted out first.
Do you mean that the results are mixed? Some people prefer LaTeX way, while similar fraction of people prefer something more standard? > The babel and polyglossia configurations allow both closer-to-manual and > "abstracted" configurations. They will not be activated unless you use > LATEX-MULTI-LANG though. This is to provide transparent support for > current documents. Good. I will look into this set of patches then. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
