Slawomir Grochowski <[email protected]> writes: > Ihor Radchenko <[email protected]> writes: > >> That sounds ok, although I think that for column view in particular an >> interesting alternative could be introducing *new* summary types with >> recursive variants. That will provide a more granular control. >> Something like rX, rX/, rX%. > > I suggest naming them Xr, Xr/, and Xr%.
> The existing checkbox types already form a group: > > X, X/, X% > > Using the Xr prefix would keep the recursive variants next to them when > summary types are displayed or completed alphabetically: > > X, X/, X%, Xr, Xr/, Xr% > > With rX, they would be separated from the other "checkbox summary types". > > Would you agree? +1 -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode maintainer, Learn more about Org mode at <https://orgmode.org/>. Support Org development at <https://liberapay.com/org-mode>, or support my work at <https://liberapay.com/yantar92>
