At Wed, 4 Nov 2009 14:01:23 +0000, Rick Moynihan wrote: > > 2009/11/4 Adam Spiers <orgm...@adamspiers.org>: > > > > I disagree - I think using git with a centralized model provides the > > best of both worlds: simplicity but also all the nice benefits of > > decentralization such as offline commit and history access, > > intelligent merging etc. Lots of people do it this way, e.g. > > > > http://feeding.cloud.geek.nz/2008/12/setting-up-centralied-git-repository.html > > +10 :-)
[...] > > By comparison git is hassle free and far more robust. Though git is > my preference using git, mercurial or bzr would always be preferable > for me over SVN. I agree as well. I gave up on SVN after having been bitten one too many times. I will say, however, that although I use git [*] for keeping my org-mode files in sync, for the central repository model, I find that mercurial works better in that it's simpler to use. However, mercurial and git are pretty much the same in this regard. [*] Despite using mercurial for almost everything else, I use git and not mercurial for org-mode as mercurial is not available on my maemo Internet tablet.... _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Remember: use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode