On Dec 9, 2009, at 11:50 PM, Nicolas Girard wrote:
2009/12/9 Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com>:
Hi Nicolas,
I need additional information with respect to this patch:
diff --git a/lisp/org-latex.el b/lisp/org-latex.el
index ce697a3..18c2183 100644
--- a/lisp/org-latex.el
+++ b/lisp/org-latex.el
@@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ If NUM, export sections as numerical sections."
(delete-region (point-at-bol 0) (point))
(insert (format "\\begin{%s}\n"
(symbol-name org-export-latex-low-
levels))))
- (insert (format "\n\\item %s\\\\\n%s\n"
+ (insert (format "\\item %s\n%s"
heading
(if label (format "\\label{%s}" label)
"")))
(insert (org-export-latex-content content))
Why would you like to remove the "\\" as well? When itemize lists
are used
to format headlines, I think there should be a line break after the
end of
the original headline. Otherwise the text below the headline will
flow into
the headline. Or am I missing something here?
I think you're right ; I may have been abused by what Adobe Reader
displayed when performing my tests, as I just discovered that, for
whatever reason, it doesn't always reload the pdf file when using
<Ctrl-r>
Using this test document
#===========
* Level 1
** Level 2
*** Level 3
**** Level 4
Text
#===========
the current code produces
%==========
\begin{itemize}
\item Level 4\\
\label{sec-1.1.1.1}
Text
%==========
There's an extra space produced by the \label{} because there's no '%'
at the end of it ; another solution is to move the \label before the
\\
I prefer to write
\label{...}%
if you can agree to that.
There's also an extra newline before "Text".
Please find attached my second proposal to fix this.
@@ -997,7 +997,7 @@ OPT-PLIST is the options plist for current
buffer."
(org-export-apply-macros-in-string org-export-latex-append-
header)
;; insert the title
(format
- "\n\n\\title{%s}\n"
+ "\n\\title{%s}\n"
;; convert the title
(org-export-latex-content
title '(lists tables fixed-width keywords)))
What is the problem with additional empty lines before \\title
command.
Does that really change anything in the output?
It's not really a problem, it just seems to me like, the less extra
'\n' you see in the output of a LaTeX code generator, the more
confident you can be.
--
Nicolas
<noextralines.patch>_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode