Fixed, thank you for the report.
- Carsten
On Dec 15, 2009, at 9:07 AM, Robin Green wrote:
After I enable "column view of properties" in the attached file,
export
to PDF via LaTeX fails with the following error in the minibuffer:
org-export-as-latex: Text is read-only: "Type `e' to edit property"
Emacs : GNU Emacs 23.1.50.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 2.18.0)
of 2009-09-27 on palmer, modified by Debian
Package: Org-mode version 6.33trans
current state:
==============
(setq
org-export-latex-after-initial-vars-hook '(org-beamer-after-initial-
vars)
org-agenda-files '("/src/greenrd/org")
org-blocker-hook '(org-block-todo-from-checkboxes org-block-todo-
from-children-or-siblings-or-parent)
org-checklist-export-function 'org-export-as-ascii
org-after-todo-state-change-hook '(org-clock-out-if-current org-
checklist)
org-agenda-todo-ignore-scheduled t
org-startup-folded nil
org-agenda-sorting-strategy '((agenda time-up priority-down effort-
up category-keep)
(todo priority-down effort-up category-keep)
(tags priority-down effort-up category-keep) (search
category-keep))
org-agenda-prefix-format '((agenda . " %-12:c%-12:T%?-12t% s")
(timeline . " % s") (todo . " %-12:c")
(tags . " %-12:c") (search . " %-12:c"))
org-deadline-warning-days 900
org-export-latex-format-toc-function 'org-export-latex-format-toc-
default
org-agenda-skip-scheduled-if-done t
org-export-preprocess-hook '(org-export-blocks-preprocess)
org-tab-first-hook '(org-hide-block-toggle-maybe)
org-src-mode-hook '(org-src-mode-configure-edit-buffer)
org-confirm-shell-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
org-export-first-hook '(org-beamer-initialize-open-trackers)
org-todo-keywords '((sequence "TODO(t)" "QUESTION(q)" "PLANNING(p)"
"PENDING(e)" "STARTED(s)" "FINISHING(f)" "|"
"DONE(d)" "OBSOLETE(o)")
)
org-agenda-before-write-hook '(org-agenda-add-entry-text)
org-default-notes-file "/src/greenrd/org/remember.org"
org-cycle-hook '(org-cycle-hide-archived-subtrees org-cycle-hide-
drawers org-cycle-show-empty-lines
org-optimize-window-after-visibility-change)
org-mode-hook '(#[nil "\300\301\302\303\304$\207"
[org-add-hook change-major-mode-hook org-show-block-all append
local] 5]
)
org-global-properties '(("Effort_ALL" . "0 0:10 0:30 1:00 2:00 3:00
4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00"))
org-return-follows-link t
org-confirm-elisp-link-function 'yes-or-no-p
org-beamer-environments-extra '(("figure" "F" "\\begin{figure}" "\
\end{figure}"))
org-agenda-todo-ignore-with-date t
org-enforce-todo-dependencies t
org-occur-hook '(org-first-headline-recenter)
org-priority-start-cycle-with-default nil
org-export-preprocess-before-selecting-backend-code-hook '(org-
beamer-select-beamer-code)
org-agenda-todo-ignore-deadlines t
org-modules '(org-bbdb org-bibtex org-gnus org-info org-jsinfo org-
irc org-mew org-mhe org-rmail org-vm org-wl
org-w3m org-checklist org-interactive-query org-man org-
registry)
org-remember-templates '(("Web link" 119 "* %u %c \n\n%:region\n"
nil "Web links" nil))
org-export-latex-final-hook '(org-beamer-amend-header org-beamer-fix-
toc org-beamer-auto-fragile-frames
org-beamer-place-default-actions-for-lists)
org-enforce-todo-checkbox-dependencies t
org-lowest-priority 70
)
#+STARTUP: beamer
#+TITLE: Cohere: Towards Web 2.0 Argumentation
#+AUTHOR: Simon Buckingham Shum
#+LaTeX_CLASS: beamer
#+LaTeX_CLASS_OPTIONS: [presentation]
#+BEAMER_FRAME_LEVEL: 2
#+BEAMER_HEADER_EXTRA: \usetheme{Szeged}\usecolortheme{wolverine}
\institute{Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK}
#+COLUMNS: %45ITEM %10BEAMER_env(Env) %10BEAMER_envargs(Env Args)
%4BEAMER_col(Col) %8BEAMER_extra(Extra)
#+PROPERTY: BEAMER_col_ALL 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9
1.0 :ETC
* Context
** What is argumentation software?
*** *mapping* an argument :BMCOL:
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_col: 0.5
:BEAMER_envargs: C[T]
:END:
**** exposing its structure
***** typically in graph form
*** for the purposes of this talk
# I was going to say "typically" here, but I've only read 4-5 papers
# in this area, so I can't be sure that it's typical. But that's how
# it seems to me.
**** *manual* data entry
***** not extraction
**** can relate back to sources
***** links
***** video timestamps
*** :B_figure:BMCOL:
:BMCOL:B_figure:
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_col: 0.5
:BEAMER_env: figure
:END:
\includegraphics[width=.7\columnwidth]{What_the_Bible_says.jpg}
*** optionally
**** *queries* for sub-arguments
**** *multiple* I/O styles
***** directed graph
***** textual outline
**** *collaborative editing*
** Why use argumentation software?
*** example: climate change debates
*** large and complex
*** interdisciplinary
**** science
**** politics
**** economics
**** ethics
*** timely
**** Copenhagen conference
***** G77 delegates walk out
*** relevant to Cohere
**** ESSENCE project
** How might argumentation software help?
*** could make large, complex arguments
**** easier to navigate?
**** easier to search?
**** quicker to grasp?
***** or maybe /think/ you've grasped!
**** less repetitive
***** but Flat Earthers still exist
*** propagate updates in knowledge faster?
**** propagate lies and stupid ideas faster?
*** make debate more meritocratic?
**** "blogging will level the playing field" all over again?
** What does this sound like?
*** Wikipedia
**** similar advantages have been attributed to it
*** Is argumentation software reinventing the wheel?
**** inaccessibility of WP technical & scientific articles
**** different goals and value systems
***** WP: "Neutral Point of View" allows "he said / she said"
***** WP: Reliable Sources and Notability
***** WP: info not systematically structured along debate lines
* The paper
** Introduction
*** Motivation
**** :B_quotation:
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_env: quotation
:END:
The context in which we find ourselves presents problems on a global
scale which will
require negotiation and collaboration across national, cultural and
intellectual
boundaries.
*** Differences from related work
**** distributed vs team-based
**** asynchronous vs real-time
**** introducing Web 2.0 principles
** Web 2.0 according to Buckingham Shum
*** Some have dismissed as marketing term
*** Four relevant elements
**** Simple but engaging multimedia UIs
***** Web UIs should stand on a par with desktop UIs
**** Emergent, not predefined, structure and semantics
***** let users define their own classification schemes
***** lightweight approaches (tags for blogs, social tagging) have
good uptake
**** Social networks
***** status updates, friend recommendations, "reputation" indices
**** Data interop, mashups and embedding
** Cohere data model
*** :B_figure:
:PROPERTIES:
:BEAMER_env: figure
:END:
\includegraphics[width=.7\textwidth]{Cohere-data-model.png}
** Web 2.0-ish features
*** Emergent structure
**** Users can add own relation types
***** but seed data & autocompletion used to "nudge" users
*** Social
**** each idea links back to creating user
**** Future / in development
***** sitewide feeds (like Twitter's "everyone")
***** active user stats
***** notification when your idea is connected to someone else's
***** notification when your idea is embedded in another website
***** different views for when multiple people work on one idea
(vague)
** Interop
*** XML-based feeds (RSS/Atom)
*** high level of addressability
**** almost everything has a unique URL
***** allows embedding using HTML iframes
*** import from Compendium offline argumentation tool
*** Future
**** export in a "variety of formats"
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
