David Maus <maus.da...@gmail.com> writes: > Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >>David Maus <maus.da...@gmail.com> writes: > >>> Łukasz Stelmach wrote: >>>>The other one helps if for some reason the file one would like to add >>>>matches an entry in a .gitignore file. I suppose no one puts anything in >>>>the org-attach-directory by hand, so anything that goes there is by >>>>intention. >>>>http://github.com/steelman/steelman-org-mode/commit/8ade081fd5a331cc61f8f8a6f8cf5a92ff8881d5 >>> [...] >>> In addition one might explicitly include the content of attachment >>> directories using the negating operator in .gitignore. >>This might be a better solution indeed. > > Yep. Though about it: Using the -f switch overrides any configuration > of git a user may have made in a system wide, user or repository > specific gitignore -- that shouldn't be turned on by default or even > enforced in the source.
You're right, I admit. Please forget this commit. Take only the one about xargs --no-run-if-empty http://github.com/steelman/steelman-org-mode/commit/8dc5033d13af1d0aa6f1094a1775cc1a1ec33c67 >>I'll investigate it a little bit closer. > > Just an idea: Why not add hooks that are called after certain > attachment operations (add, remove, update)? This way we could > decouple a (specific) use of git or even of git itself. That's a little more hacking that I'd like to do now. Anyone? > Some other thing: As far as I understood the source an error while > synchronizing the attachment directory is indiciated in the "*Shell > Command Output*" buffer and the miniprompt. I'm not sure if this > should be considered sufficient or not. It's been enough for me to start investigating. It depends on how userfriendly orgmode is supposed to be. -- Miłego dnia, Łukasz Stelmach _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
