Carsten Dominik <carsten.domi...@gmail.com> writes: > On Mar 8, 2010, at 8:57 AM, Tom wrote: > >> It's not clear to me in case of a timestamp like this >> >> <2010-03-08 H 21:30 .+1d> >> >> why can't the reschedule feature change the date/time part only >> and leave the repeater part intact? Why does it have to throw the >> error "Cannot reschedule task with repeater"? >> >> I see no compelling reason for not allowing rescheduling in this case. >> Maybe an option could be added which the user could set if he wants >> to allow rescheduling even in case of schedules with repeater. > > Hi Tom, > > there is no compelling reason except a technical reason. It was > kind of hard to make this work because of the way scheduling > and deadlining is implemented. When I added the error message, > it was because that seemed better than removing the repeater silently. > > I have now removed this limitation, because, as you say, it > really should not be there.D
This is wonderful news! I've been wishing for this functionality for a long time. Thanks to Tom for asking and thanks to Carsten, as always, for implementing it. Best, Matt _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode