Sebastian Rose <sebastian_r...@gmx.de> writes:

> OK - there _must_ be a missunderstanding...

Quite probably. But I don't wish to make further noise about a topic
most here likely don't care much about, so I will try to make this my
last message in this thread unless new information comes to light.

> We all post via "reply all" to support unsubscribed users. They (you?)
> couldn't discuss in realtime otherwise.

In fact, many people in this thread have *not* done that, and I've read
every message sent to the forum just fine. Gmane allows an NNTP
interface to the forum; that's pretty much the point for me. If you are
sending an extra copy to me specifically, please don't; it doesn't help.


As for the many suggestions to set up authentication tokens that lie
dormant: I have explained my position on proliferation of authentication
tokens, and some people have understood. That's good enough for now.
Let's get back to Org-mode discussions :-)

-- 
 \         “Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I |
  `\    guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis.” —Jack Handey |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney



_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode

Reply via email to