On 2010-05-09 12:43 +0100, Carsten Dominik wrote: > what do you think about C-M-f, C-M-b, C-M-n, C-M-p as alternative > bindings? These seem to make *a lot* of sense, because, as many here > have pointed out, they are so much better repeatable (Keep C-M- down, > press the character.)
It is terrible idea to override these parenthesis movement bindings. They are universal in all editing modes that if overridden people who also use other emacs packages will be surprised. For example to move from a open parenthesis to a closing parenthesis. However, it makes sense to bind C-M-a and C-M-e to move the the beginning/end of a subtree. I don't use these org movement bindings much because isearch does the job perfectly and it can be used everywhere. Leo -- CCL-USER> _ _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
