Applied, thanks.
- Carsten
On May 14, 2010, at 11:01 PM, David Maus wrote:
Bernt Hansen wrote:
David Maus <dm...@ictsoc.de> writes:
Ah, yes, thanks. Deleting the property occurred on the wrong
place. Fixed in
51a37ca09529e2597a863e7b7390da4409c750dc in
git://github.com/dmj/dmj-org-mode.git quickfix.
I'm not sure if we should delete an empty property drawer after
cloning, too. E.g. If the ID property was the only property of the
original subtree the clone have an empty property drawer. Though,
it
is just a cosmetic issue.
Personally I would prefer to delete the empty drawer. I still have
weird behaviour with cloning a subtree. I start with this: [...]
Again, sorry, yes. The problem was that I told Org to remove the ID
property at headline at point after inserting the clone. Merely the
headline at point after insert is not necessarily the clone but a
sibling of the clone.
Now it is definetly fixed in git://github.com/dmj/dmj-org-mode.git
quickfix -- Org removes the ID property in the copy of the original
subtree before it is inserted anywhere.
Dang, you should always be sure where (point) is when depending
(point) to be somewhere specific.
HTH
-- David
--
OpenPGP... 0x99ADB83B5A4478E6
Jabber.... dmj...@jabber.org
Email..... dm...@ictsoc.de
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
- Carsten
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
