Hi John, Yes the following should be sufficient
;; setup ditaa (setq org-ditaa-jar-path "~/.elisp/org.git/contrib/scripts/ditaa.jar") (org-babel-do-load-languages 'org-babel-load-languages '((ditaa . t) (gnuplot . t))) What happens if you try to evaluate the following in an Org-mode buffer with C-c C-c? #+begin_src ditaa :file example.png +---------------+ | | | ditaa example | | | +---------------+ #+end_src Best -- Eric John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: > Thanks Eric... I should have included that my .emacs file has the following > (which I followed from here: > http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#ob-configuration-changes): > > ;; setup ditaa > (setq org-ditaa-jar-path "~/.elisp/org.git/contrib/scripts/ditaa.jar") > (org-babel-do-load-languages > 'org-babel-load-languages > '((ditaa . t) > (gnuplot . t))) > (require 'ob-ditaa) > > If I understand correctly, the (ditaa . t) and (require 'ob-ditaa) are > redundant but since it wasn't working, I tried both. Is this what I need to > have babel work with ditaa? > > Thanks for any input... > John > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 4:57 PM, Eric Schulte <schulte.e...@gmail.com>wrote: > >> Hi John, >> >> Yes, (1) below is the preferred format, however the "ditaa" language is >> not enabled by default. Please customize the org-babel-load-languages >> variable to enable support for evaluating ditaa code blocks, and then >> try the code block syntax mentioned in (1) below again and a ditaa >> figure should be successfully exported. >> >> A benefit of the (1) (aka Babel) method below is that code blocks can be >> evaluated "live" from inside the Org-mode buffer with C-c C-c. See >> Chapter 14 of the manual or the relevant portion of the quick guide >> http://orgmode.org/guide/Working-With-Source-Code.html for more >> information on using Babel. >> >> Best -- Eric >> >> John Hendy <jw.he...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > >> > I have been having a difficult time with an export (which includes a >> ditaa >> > graphic) to PDF via LaTeX recently and am puzzled by it. Which is the >> > correct format? >> > >> > 1) Supported by: >> > - http://doc.norang.ca/org-mode.html#playingwithditaa >> > - http://orgmode.org/Changes.html#ob-configuration-changes (indirectly >> seems >> > to indicate this format?) >> > >> > #+begin_src ditaa :file file.png :cmdline -r -S -s 2.5 >> > --- >> > Picture here >> > --- >> > #+end_src >> > >> > >> > 2) Supported by: >> > - http://orgmode.org/worg/org-contrib/org-exp-blocks.php >> > - >> > >> http://emacs-fu.blogspot.com/2009/10/writing-presentations-with-org-mode-and.html >> > >> > #+begin_ditaa file.png -r -S -s 2.5 >> > --- >> > Picture here >> > --- >> > #+end_ditaa >> > >> > Only #2 is working for me currently, though I suspect that #1 is the >> 'truer' >> > form? Not sure what's going on... >> > >> > >> > Thanks, >> > John >> > >> > P.S. Is there a way to enlarge the output? Using the -s option only seems >> to >> > make the resolution higher, not change the actual size (inches, pixels, >> > whatever) in the LaTeX output... >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> > Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> > Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >> _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
