It tries to call looking-at-p. Is that a 23ism?
I run Emacs 22. If that isn't it, I will do a backtrace etc. Thanks. On 2010-08-16, Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> wrote: > > On Aug 16, 2010, at 5:55 PM, Samuel Wales wrote: > >> On 2010-08-16, Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> wrote: >>> Yes, sorting is one of the issues that will loose markers. >> >> Do you think that a cautious move here would be to compare the >> headline of the target to the headline you think matches the target? >> Then the refile can be aborted if they do not match. > > Hi Samuel, > > yes, this is in fact a good secure measure - sorry for making it you > say it three times before getting the idea. > > This should be working now. > > Best wishes > > - Carsten > >> >>> >>> - Carsten >>> >>>> >>>> Samuel >>>> >>>> >>>> P.S. The running clock also gets lost all the time. Even when >>>> point is in it! >>>> >>>> On 2010-08-16, Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> On Aug 2, 2010, at 4:49 AM, Samuel Wales wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Carsten, >>>>>> >>>>>> Thank you for thinking of our bugs. This is superb. >>>>>> >>>>>> I have used it for a while now. >>>>>> >>>>>> It speeds things up enormously, making the difference between >>>>>> usability and not. >>>>>> >>>>>> However, I have definitely had headlines get refiled to the wrong >>>>>> place. >>>>> >>>>> Ouch, this is bad. >>>>> >>>>> If you do a lot of moving stuff around in the buffer, the markers >>>>> pointing to refile locations will become wrong. So you then need >>>>> to clear the cache, to make sure you get fresh positions. >>>>> >>>>> A good example where it goes wrong would, of cause, be useful. >>>>> >>>>> - Carsten >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> I am not able to track it down now, but I do have a >>>>>> suggestion. >>>>>> >>>>>> ==> Would it be possible to print the actual target that the >>>>>> headline >>>>>> got refiled to, instead of the name associated with the marker? >>>>>> At >>>>>> present, org says that it successfully refiled to the target >>>>>> headline >>>>>> when it did not. >>>>>> >>>>>> ==> Alternatively, org could compare the actual headline it was >>>>>> refiled to against the headline it was supposed to refile to. >>>>>> Then >>>>>> you'd get an error if they do not match. >>>>>> >>>>>> As for the bugs, I cannot investigate further now. Debugging is >>>>>> difficult for me. >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps more error checking as above will make the bug show up >>>>>> better. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks. >>>>>> >>>>>> Samuel >>>>>> >>>>>> On 2010-05-17, Carsten Dominik <domi...@uva.nl> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Sebastian, hi Samuel, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I remember that both of you have in the past reported that >>>>>>> refiling >>>>>>> has a long startup time because of target collection. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have now built a cache for refile targets and would like you to >>>>>>> try >>>>>>> it out. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> (setq org-refile-use-cache t) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This will speed up refile target collection for the second and >>>>>>> further >>>>>>> instance. >>>>>>> If you are moving or adding entries that are targets themselves, >>>>>>> that >>>>>>> chace needs to be cleared with prefix arg 0 (zero), i.e. `C-0 C-c >>>>>>> C- >>>>>>> w' >>>>>>> or, if you prefer, with a triple C-u prefix. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Samuel, note that this only speeds up target collection - it does >>>>>>> nothing to the overhead added by ido - so we will have to see how >>>>>>> much >>>>>>> this helps for your use-case. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - Carsten >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb? >>>>>> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease >>>>>> for >>>>>> 25 years] >>>>>> ========== >>>>>> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >>>>>> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >>>>>> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >>>>>> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode >>>>> >>>>> - Carsten >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb? >>>> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for >>>> 25 years] >>>> ========== >>>> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE >>>> DONATE >>>> === >>>> PNAS must publish the original Lo and Alter NIH/FDA XMRV paper >>>> verbatim along with the new paper. >>> >>> - Carsten >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb? >> A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for >> 25 years] >> ========== >> Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE >> DONATE >> === >> PNAS must publish the original Lo and Alter NIH/FDA XMRV paper >> verbatim along with the new paper. >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Emacs-orgmode mailing list >> Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. >> Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org >> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode > > - Carsten > > > > -- Q: How many CDC "scientists" does it take to change a lightbulb? A: "You only think it's dark." [CDC has denied a deadly disease for 25 years] ========== Retrovirus: http://www.wpinstitute.org/xmrv/index.html -- PLEASE DONATE === PNAS must publish the original Lo and Alter NIH/FDA XMRV paper verbatim along with the new paper. _______________________________________________ Emacs-orgmode mailing list Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list. Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
