Sébastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7...@public.gmane.org>
writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>>> Sébastien Vauban
>>> <wxhgmqzgwmuf-genee64ty+gs+fvcfc7uqw-xmd5yjdbdmrg2nfembr...@public.gmane.orgorg>
>>> writes:
>>>> Hi Eric,
>>>> Sébastien Vauban wrote:
>>> as a side note, for experimenting with tangling like in the above, I
>>> find the `org-babel-expand-src-block' command bound to C-c C-v v
>>> (mnemonic "view") to be very useful as it shows the expanded version of
>>> the current code block.
>>
>> Knew about it. But... never used/thought before. Interesting command!
>
> Though...
>
> When editing code with =C-c '=, I chose to reuse the current window.
>
> When viewing the results, I find myself preferring to use another window, so
> that I see what the code is, and to what it gets converted.
>
> For the first case, I have to write:
>
> (setq org-src-window-setup 'current-window)
>
> For the second:
>
> (setq org-src-window-setup 'reorganize-frame)
>
> Is it, then, possible to get two vars? Or is my suggestion a bit silly?
Hi Seb, in the absence of having distinct variables for this, you could
make your own version, e.g.
(defun my/org-babel-expand-src-block ()
(interactive)
(let ((org-src-window-setup 'reorganize-frame))
(org-babel-expand-src-block)))
Dan
>
>
>>>> Maybe it'd be good to echo that "no eval" occurs anymore in such a
>>>> condition?
>>>
>>> hmm, but then it would inhibit C-c C-c from performing the next action
>>> in the `org-ctrl-c-ctrl-c-hook'.
>>
>> I mean: if C-c C-c is disabled, but run on code, then echo "I do nothing". If
>> not, do the same as C-c C-v C-e...
>>
>> Feasible? Interesting (for others, like me, in the future)?
>
> Echoing that request, so that you can answer both in one post...
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Best regards,
> Seb
_______________________________________________
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
